crypto.news
2025-04-22 06:52:58

Class-action targets Meteora and Kelsier execs over $69m M3M3 token crash

Solana-based decentralized exchange Meteora is facing a class-action lawsuit that accuses affiliated parties of orchestrating a fraudulent launch of the M3M3 token, resulting in alleged investor losses. An April 21 filing in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, brought on behalf of affected investors, alleges that Meteora, its CEO Benjamin Chow, venture firm Kelsier Labs, and executives Hayden, Gideon, and Charles Thomas Davis misled the public about the $M3M3 token launch and manipulated its price to cash out at a premium. According to the complaint, insiders behind the project quietly secured as much as 95% of the $M3M3 token supply by using a network of over 150 wallets. They then restricted access to public buyers during the early trading window, allegedly locking out retail investors while inflating the price through internal trades. Once the price surged, the insiders were accused of dumping their holdings on the market, triggering a sharp crash within days. The lawsuit says the project was pitched as a solution to the “pump-and-dump” culture plaguing meme coins, with Chow promoting $M3M3 as a safe, stake-backed token with long-term value. Investors were told that the launch would be transparent and open, and that staking rewards would come from transaction fees on Meteora itself, claims the plaintiffs now argue were deliberately misleading. You might also like: New York-based Burwick Law files class action lawsuit over LIBRA token launch The suit claims that this coordinated scheme led to over $69 million in damages, as non-insider investors bought into the hype only to see the token’s value collapse within days of its launch on December 4. The sharp downturn reportedly began on December 6, shortly after insiders offloaded their tokens. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants made calculated efforts to regain investor trust after the crash by artificially re-inflating the token’s value, but these attempts failed to restore long-term stability. They also claim that the defendants deliberately concealed their identities and affiliations during the offering, creating the illusion of a fair, community-driven launch. Both Meteora and Kelsier Labs have already been in hot water this year, with their names tied to the LIBRA token crash that wiped out millions. During the LIBRA scandal, insiders were accused of using private liquidity structures to cash out at the top, leaving regular traders blindsided. The same teams were also linked to MELANIA, another memecoin launch that ended in losses for retail buyers. Chow has since stepped down from his role at Meteora, following allegations that he privately received or managed LIBRA tokens. The April 21 suit claims the launch of M3M3 followed the same playbook. As such, plaintiffs are asking the court to appoint a receiver over Meteora to oversee its operations and safeguard remaining assets. They’re also pushing for stake-based meme tokens like $M3M3 to be officially classified as securities. “The complaint asks the court to classify stake‑based meme tokens as securities and to appoint a receiver over Meteora, steps that could influence how any new celebrity or political token is brought to market on Solana,” according to Max Burwick from Burwick Law, one of the attorneys representing the investor group. Burwick and his firm previously filed a separate class-action lawsuit on March 18 targeting Kelsier Ventures, KIP Protocol, and Meteora over their alleged roles in the LIBRA token scandal. Read more: Oregon files ‘copycat’ lawsuit against Coinbase, mirroring SEC action

Holen Sie sich Crypto Newsletter
Lesen Sie den Haftungsausschluss : Alle hierin bereitgestellten Inhalte unserer Website, Hyperlinks, zugehörige Anwendungen, Foren, Blogs, Social-Media-Konten und andere Plattformen („Website“) dienen ausschließlich Ihrer allgemeinen Information und werden aus Quellen Dritter bezogen. Wir geben keinerlei Garantien in Bezug auf unseren Inhalt, einschließlich, aber nicht beschränkt auf Genauigkeit und Aktualität. Kein Teil der Inhalte, die wir zur Verfügung stellen, stellt Finanzberatung, Rechtsberatung oder eine andere Form der Beratung dar, die für Ihr spezifisches Vertrauen zu irgendeinem Zweck bestimmt ist. Die Verwendung oder das Vertrauen in unsere Inhalte erfolgt ausschließlich auf eigenes Risiko und Ermessen. Sie sollten Ihre eigenen Untersuchungen durchführen, unsere Inhalte prüfen, analysieren und überprüfen, bevor Sie sich darauf verlassen. Der Handel ist eine sehr riskante Aktivität, die zu erheblichen Verlusten führen kann. Konsultieren Sie daher Ihren Finanzberater, bevor Sie eine Entscheidung treffen. Kein Inhalt unserer Website ist als Aufforderung oder Angebot zu verstehen